Seeing Through the Code: How Survivorship Bias Can Mislead Your Tech Team Management

In the fast-paced world of tech, success stories abound. We hear about revolutionary apps, groundbreaking algorithms, and overnight coding sensations. But amidst these narratives, a crucial element often gets lost: the countless projects that didn't make the cut. This is where survivorship bias creeps in, distorting our perception of team performance and hindering real growth.

Survivorship bias is the cognitive error where we focus solely on successful projects, neglecting the failures and challenges faced by others. In tech teams, this can translate to basing project decisions on runaway successes, overlooking the valuable learnings from projects that encountered roadblocks. This can lead to unrealistic deadlines, wasted resources on overhyped frameworks, and a demotivated team feeling like they're constantly falling short.

A study published in the Journal of Systems and Software Engineering by Andreas Jedlitschka et al. explored this concept in the context of software development methodologies [1]. They found that teams often overestimate the effectiveness of methodologies used by "successful" projects, neglecting the impact of team dynamics, project scope, and external factors.

So, how can we combat survivorship bias in our tech teams? Here are a few effective strategies backed by research:

• Embrace Retrospective Reviews: Don't just celebrate successful projects. Conduct regular post-mortems for both successes and failures. Encourage a blame-free environment where team members openly discuss challenges and identify areas for improvement. This approach aligns with the concept of psychological safety, as highlighted in Amy Edmondson's research published in Administrative Science Quarterly [2]. When team members feel safe discussing both wins and losses, valuable learning opportunities emerge.

• Seek Diverse Data Sources: Don't just focus on flashy conference talks showcasing perfect code. Look for resources that delve into the realities of software development, including blog posts discussing common pitfalls and "lessons learned" articles by developers who encountered challenges. This approach ensures a more well-rounded perspective on the software development landscape.

• Learn from Open-Source Projects: Many open-source projects offer valuable insights into the messy realities of software development. Studying the codebase evolution of successful open-source projects, including bug fixes, refactoring efforts, and architectural decisions, can provide a realistic view of the software development lifecycle.

By incorporating these techniques, you can create a more grounded perspective on project success within your team. This fosters realistic expectations, encourages knowledge sharing from failed attempts, and ultimately, cultivates a learning environment where every project, success or failure, contributes to the team's growth.

Conclusion

Survivorship bias can be a significant hurdle in effectively managing tech teams. By recognizing its influence and implementing these research-backed techniques, you can ensure your team learns from both triumphs and tribulations, paving the way for a more innovative and successful tech environment.

To stay ahead of the curve and make the best decisions for yourself and your team, subscribe to the Manager's Tech Edge newsletter! Weekly actionable insights in decision-making, AI, and software engineering.

References

1. Jedlitschka, Andreas, et al. "A systematic review of software development life cycle (SDLC) success factors." Journal of Systems and Software Engineering (2008): 65-84. [1]

2. Edmondson, Amy C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. [2]